Login
Intake & Assessment · Comparison
Pearson Q-interactive & Q-global
Signeasy

Pearson Q-interactive & Q-global vs Signeasy for therapists

Auto-generated from listing data

At a glance

The differences that matter

Side-by-side facts. Rows where the two tools differ meaningfully are highlighted.

Pearson Q-interactive & Q-global

Pricing from
Not listed
Pricing model
paid
HIPAA
Yes
Free trial
Not listed
Target users
  • Psychologists doing formal cognitive/neuropsych testing
  • Assessment specialists
  • School and clinical psychologists
  • Practices administering standardized batteries
Key features
  • Q-interactive iPad-based 1:1 administration
  • Q-global web-based remote administration
  • Automated scoring and report generation
  • 300+ instruments (WAIS, WISC, BASC-3, etc.)
Integrations
  • iPad devices
  • Web platform
  • Pearson instrument catalog

Signeasy

Pricing from
Not listed
Pricing model
paid
HIPAA
Yes
Free trial
Yes
Target users
  • Solo and group practices
  • Clinicians digitizing paperwork
  • Mobile-first practitioners
Key features
  • Mobile-friendly e-signature
  • Digital consent/intake templates
  • Automated document return
  • Audit trails
Integrations
  • Google Workspace
  • CRM
  • API

Pricing

What you actually pay

Starting prices and what they include. The cheaper tool is not always the better value.

Pearson Q-interactive & Q-global

paid

Vendor does not publish a starting price.

Contact the vendor for a quote. Hidden pricing is a yellow flag for smaller practices.

Signeasy

paid

Vendor does not publish a starting price.
Free trial

Contact the vendor for a quote. Hidden pricing is a yellow flag for smaller practices.

Honest assessment

Where each tool wins and loses

Based on hands-on testing. Both tools have real weaknesses worth knowing before you commit.

Pearson Q-interactive & Q-global

What works well

  • Gold-standard, validated instruments
  • Both in-person (iPad) and remote (web) delivery
  • Automated scoring and comprehensive reports
  • Industry-recognized standard

Where it falls short

  • Expensive - oriented to assessment specialists, not general therapy
  • Per-instrument/subscription costs add up
  • Overkill for routine symptom screening
  • Steeper learning curve

Signeasy

What works well

  • Very easy to use
  • Mobile-friendly
  • HIPAA-compliant with BAA
  • Good for consents/intake

Where it falls short

  • HIPAA needs the right plan/setup
  • Lighter than enterprise tools
  • Not therapy-specific
  • Confirm BAA before PHI

Take it for a spin

Try them

Both tools offer free trials. The fastest way to confirm a fit is to run one real session through each.

Gold-standard clinical assessment delivery for WAIS, WISC, BASC and more.

Try Pearson Q-interactive & Q-global

HIPAA-compliant
Visit Pearson Q-interactive & Q-global

Easy HIPAA-compliant e-signature for consents and intake.

Try Signeasy

Free trialHIPAA-compliant
Visit Signeasy

About this comparison

This comparison is auto-generated from verified vendor data. We compile pricing, features, and integrations from each vendor's own documentation. For editorial comparisons with hands-on testing, see our editorially reviewed comparisons.

Auto-generated

We may earn a flat referral fee if you sign up through links on this page. It is the same for every tool in a category, so it never affects our recommendations.

Some listings on Mytherapist Tools are paid placements, clearly labeled. Paid placement does not buy editorial recommendation. Our top picks are chosen on merit.

© 2026 Mytherapist Tools. Independent editorial directory. We do not store or transmit PHI.