Blueprint
freemium
$1/month
Free trial$38/mo less than the other
AI Clinical Notes & Scribes · Comparison
Blueprint
Emosapien
Blueprint vs Emosapien for therapists
Auto-generated from listing data
At a glance
The differences that matter
Side-by-side facts. Rows where the two tools differ meaningfully are highlighted.
| Feature | | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing from | $1 / mo | $39 / mo |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| HIPAASame | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Not listed |
| Target users |
|
|
| Key features |
|
|
| Integrations |
|
|
Blueprint
- Pricing from
- $1 / mo
- Pricing model
- freemium
- HIPAA
- Yes
- Free trial
- Yes
- Target users
- Clinicians practicing measurement-based care
- Solo therapists wanting a free EHR
- Practices contracted with payers requiring MBC
- Outcome-focused supervision programs
- Key features
- Free EHR with scheduling, billing, forms, insurance
- AI Assistant for progress notes ($0.99-2.99/session)
- Automated client assessments (PHQ-9, GAD-7, PCL-5, etc.)
- Outcomes dashboard for clinicians and clients
- Integrations
- Major EHR systems (varies — confirm with sales)
- Validated assessment instruments (50+)
Emosapien
- Pricing from
- $39 / mo
- Pricing model
- paid
- HIPAA
- Yes
- Free trial
- Not listed
- Target users
- Therapists practicing specific modalities (CBT/ACT/DBT)
- Clinicians who care about HIPAA psychotherapy-note protections
- Key features
- Modality-aware language (CBT, ACT, DBT)
- Psychotherapy notes vs progress notes separation
- Multiple capture modes
- Trauma-informed templates
- Integrations
- EHR copy-paste
Pricing
What you actually pay
Starting prices and what they include. The cheaper tool is not always the better value.
Emosapien
paid
$39/month
Honest assessment
Where each tool wins and loses
Based on hands-on testing. Both tools have real weaknesses worth knowing before you commit.
Blueprint
What works well
- EHR core is free forever
- Strong measurement-based care library
- Usage-based pricing scales with caseload
- Backed by clinical evidence (faster response per case study)
Where it falls short
- Progress tracking is questionnaire-driven, not session-driven
- Note quality reportedly varies with session complexity
- Less alliance-focused analytics than Mentalyc
- Usage-based pricing harder to forecast than flat subscription
Emosapien
What works well
- Modality-aware (genuinely useful for non-CBT clinicians)
- Therapy-only focus
Where it falls short
- Smaller brand than Mentalyc/Upheal
- Pricing transparency low
Take it for a spin
Try them
Both tools offer free trials. The fastest way to confirm a fit is to run one real session through each.
AI-assisted EHR for therapists with measurement-based care built in.
Try Blueprint
From $1/moFree trialHIPAA-compliant
Visit BlueprintTherapy-native AI scribe with modality-aware language.
Try Emosapien
From $39/moHIPAA-compliant
Visit EmosapienAbout this comparison
This comparison is auto-generated from verified vendor data. We compile pricing, features, and integrations from each vendor's own documentation. For editorial comparisons with hands-on testing, see our editorially reviewed comparisons.
Auto-generatedWe may earn a flat referral fee if you sign up through links on this page. It is the same for every tool in a category, so it never affects our recommendations.
Some listings on Mytherapist Tools are paid placements, clearly labeled. Paid placement does not buy editorial recommendation. Our top picks are chosen on merit.