Luma Health
paid
Vendor does not publish a starting price.
Contact the vendor for a quote. Hidden pricing is a yellow flag for smaller practices.
Marketing & Website Tools · Comparison
Zocdoc
Luma Health
Luma Health vs Zocdoc for therapists
Auto-generated from listing data
At a glance
The differences that matter
Side-by-side facts. Rows where the two tools differ meaningfully are highlighted.
| Feature | Luma Health | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing fromSame | Not listed | Not listed |
| Pricing model | paid | free |
| HIPAA | Yes | Not listed |
| Free trial | Not listed | Yes |
| Target users |
|
|
| Key features |
|
|
| Integrations |
|
|
Luma Health
- Pricing from
- Not listed
- Pricing model
- paid
- HIPAA
- Yes
- Free trial
- Not listed
- Target users
- Clinics and health systems
- Behavioral-health groups
- Practices automating the patient journey
- Key features
- Self-scheduling and waitlist fill
- Recall campaigns
- Reminders and intake
- Two-way messaging
- Integrations
- Major EHR/PM systems
Zocdoc
- Pricing from
- Not listed
- Pricing model
- free
- HIPAA
- Not listed
- Free trial
- Yes
- Target users
- Insurance-accepting therapists
- Practices wanting pay-for-results visibility
- Clinicians comfortable with per-booking fees
- Key features
- Search-optimized provider profile
- Insurance-based client search
- Online scheduling and intake
- Pay-per-new-patient model (no subscription)
- Integrations
- Common calendars
- Some EHR scheduling syncs
Pricing
What you actually pay
Starting prices and what they include. The cheaper tool is not always the better value.
Zocdoc
free
Free
Free trial
Honest assessment
Where each tool wins and loses
Based on hands-on testing. Both tools have real weaknesses worth knowing before you commit.
Luma Health
What works well
- Strong waitlist/recall tools
- End-to-end engagement
- Reduces schedule gaps
- HIPAA-compliant
Where it falls short
- Quote-based pricing
- Enterprise-leaning
- Implementation effort
- More than solo needs
Zocdoc
What works well
- No monthly subscription - pay only for new bookings
- Large consumer traffic
- Built-in scheduling and intake
- Strong for insurance search
Where it falls short
- Per-booking fees add up in busy markets
- Skews to insurance-based discovery
- Less ideal for private-pay-only practices
- Confirm current fee structure
Take it for a spin
Try them
Both tools offer free trials. The fastest way to confirm a fit is to run one real session through each.
Patient-engagement platform with strong scheduling, waitlist, and recall.
Try Luma Health
HIPAA-compliant
Visit Luma HealthPay-per-booking provider directory with online scheduling and intake.
Try Zocdoc
FreeFree trial
Visit ZocdocAbout this comparison
This comparison is auto-generated from verified vendor data. We compile pricing, features, and integrations from each vendor's own documentation. For editorial comparisons with hands-on testing, see our editorially reviewed comparisons.
Auto-generatedWe may earn a flat referral fee if you sign up through links on this page. It is the same for every tool in a category, so it never affects our recommendations.
Some listings on Mytherapist Tools are paid placements, clearly labeled. Paid placement does not buy editorial recommendation. Our top picks are chosen on merit.