Headway
free


The short answer
Headway and Rula offer similar services: insurance credentialing, billing, and client referrals. The key differences are insurer availability in your state, referral volume, payment timelines, and policies for retaining clients if you leave. Since the core model is similar, compare the details that affect you practice and confirm current fees and payer networks before deciding.
Skip both if
Skip both if you run a private-pay practice or want to keep your full session fee. Out-of-network tools or a membership model like Alma maybe a better fit.
At a glance
Side-by-side facts. Rows where the two tools differ meaningfully are highlighted.
| Feature | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing from | $0 / mo | Not listed |
| Pricing modelSame | free | free |
| HIPAASame | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Target users |
|
|
| Key features |
|
|
| Integrations |
|
|


Pricing
Starting prices and what they include. The cheaper tool is not always the better value.
free
free
Honest assessment
Based on hands-on testing. Both tools have real weaknesses worth knowing before you commit.


In depth
Headway and Rula run the same core model. Both help therapists accept insurance by handling credentialing, claims, billing, and client referrals. The real decision isn’t which category is better, it’s which platform works better in your state and for your practice.
Neither tool requires a monthly subscription. Instead, both generate revenue by taking a share of insurance reimbursement for each session. That means your effective cost depends on your reimbursement rates, payer mix, and client volume rather than a fixed monthly fee. Before choosing, compare your expected reimbursements on each platform instead of focusing on headline pricing alone.
Both Headway and Rula are built for HIPAA-covered mental health practice and provide HIPAA-compliant workflows for scheduling, documentation, billing, and insurance claims. As with any platform handling protected health information, review the current Business Associate and Agreement (BAA), privacy policy, and compliance documentation before onboarding.
Both tools credential therapists with insurance companies, submit claims, collect payments, and can send new client referrals. The differences come down to practical details: insurer availability in your state, referral volume and quality, credentialing timelines, payment schedules, and client portability if you leave the platform.
Which platform support more of your preferred insurance payers.
How long credentialing typically takes in your state.
How quickly reimbursements are paid.
The quality and consistency of clients referrals .
Whether you can continue treating clients independently if you leave.
Documentation workflow and day-to-day clinician experience.
If you’re choosing between Headway and Rula, don’t expect dramatically different core functionality. Both are strong options for therapists who want to accept insurance without managing bills themselves. The better choice depends on local players coverage, referral availability and reimbursement terms.
Headway often appeals to therapists who want greater flexibility and payer choice. Rula is a strong fit if its referral network and contracted insurers are well established. Verify current payer participation, reimbursement terms and referral availability before committing.
Recommendations
Different practices need different tools. Here is how the choice changes based on your situation.
Solo practice
Either, depending on your state. Both suit solo therapists seeking insurance credentialing, low admin, and client referrals. Compare your payer networks, payment speed, and client- relationship terms where you practice.
Group practice
Both support growing group practices. Compare multi-clinician management, credentialing timelines, and reporting capabilities before scaling.
Specialty focus
Either, Specialists should confirm that each platform serves their niche, support relevant payer networks, and offers client referrals in area.
Take it for a spin
Both tools offer free trials. The fastest way to confirm a fit is to run one real session through each.

Credentialing + patient matching (formerly PATH Mental Health).
Keep reading


Two large insurance credentialing platforms competing on the same therapists. Headway is free to join and credentials in 30 days; Alma is $125/mo and credentials in ~45 days but reportedly pays 1-5% higher per session. Both cover all 50 states and now include built-in telehealth. The pick depends on whether you want low fixed cost (Headway) or higher per-session revenue with community resources (Alma).
Read comparison

Both platforms are free to join and handle credentialing under their group contracts. Headway is in all 50 states and credentials in as little as 30 days; Grow Therapy is in ~36 states but credentialing can take up to 5 months. Both offer free CEUs. Pick Headway for speed and broader state coverage; Grow Therapy if you want their Psychology Today profile management and slightly more flexible caseload control.
Read comparisonAbout this comparison
This comparison was hands-on tested by our editorial team. Both tools were used on real workflows for a minimum of two weeks before this comparison was published.
We may earn a flat referral fee if you sign up through links on this page. It is the same for every tool in a category, so it never affects our recommendations.
Some listings on Mytherapist Tools are paid placements, clearly labeled. Paid placement does not buy editorial recommendation. Our top picks are chosen on merit.
Cookies on Mytherapist Tools
We use analytics cookies to see how people use the directory so we can make it better. Nothing is sold or shared with advertisers. Cookie Policy.